<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Legendary Review &#8211; Opening Pandora&#8217;s Box</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oxcgn.com/2008/11/17/legendary-review-opening-pandoras-box/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oxcgn.com/2008/11/17/legendary-review-opening-pandoras-box/</link>
	<description>Breathing Life Into Gaming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 06:50:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dkpatriarch</title>
		<link>http://oxcgn.com/2008/11/17/legendary-review-opening-pandoras-box/comment-page-1/#comment-4202</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dkpatriarch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 04:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xboxoz360.wordpress.com/?p=7350#comment-4202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks!  It really is a shame as the concept, as usual with Spark, was really good and some parts would really have stood out if the rest of the game had been more in keeping with today&#039;s quality expectations.  A few levels in England really had me enjoying myself and the sense of chaos was great.

Atari seems to encourage interesting ideas, but the studios don&#039;t seem able to follow through with them.  I think Tomb Raider will be a sure hit, but it is a shame that there isn&#039;t more quality all round.  MS, Ubisoft, EA, and Activision are so big with so many resources that it is hard for other groups to keep up.  

That worries me for independents and smaller studios on one hand, but does mean that studios have to strive for a high mark to compete.  I don&#039;t want to see cool ideas die, but I do want to see them be more than a cool idea and be a cool game too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!  It really is a shame as the concept, as usual with Spark, was really good and some parts would really have stood out if the rest of the game had been more in keeping with today&#8217;s quality expectations.  A few levels in England really had me enjoying myself and the sense of chaos was great.</p>
<p>Atari seems to encourage interesting ideas, but the studios don&#8217;t seem able to follow through with them.  I think Tomb Raider will be a sure hit, but it is a shame that there isn&#8217;t more quality all round.  MS, Ubisoft, EA, and Activision are so big with so many resources that it is hard for other groups to keep up.  </p>
<p>That worries me for independents and smaller studios on one hand, but does mean that studios have to strive for a high mark to compete.  I don&#8217;t want to see cool ideas die, but I do want to see them be more than a cool idea and be a cool game too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim McIntyre</title>
		<link>http://oxcgn.com/2008/11/17/legendary-review-opening-pandoras-box/comment-page-1/#comment-4201</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim McIntyre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 03:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xboxoz360.wordpress.com/?p=7350#comment-4201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great review mate. Will avoid this game. Sad tho, because the concept behind it seemed great.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review mate. Will avoid this game. Sad tho, because the concept behind it seemed great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

