Comments on: Ten 360 Games You Haven’t Played – Part 2

By: name

name — Wed, 27 May 2009 08:10:37 +0000

and they take a LONG time to come down.
like staw wars TFU was out september at $100 now today like 9 months after release the games only droped like 10 bucks RRRRIIIIIIIPPPPPPPP OOOOFFFFF.
or unreal tournament 3 is over 1 year old but is STILL 100 bucks+

By: name

name — Wed, 27 May 2009 08:08:01 +0000

cant realy blame us though.
there bloody expensive 110 bucks a pop normaly.
in the 2 years of having a 360 ive spent over 2K on games and system alike.
thats ALOT

By: xboxoz360

xboxoz360 — Tue, 26 May 2009 01:56:25 +0000

No one said they were AAA grade video games, Sometimes I wonder if many gamers these days aren’t sheep. If it doesn’t get great reviews, isn’t a AAA game and liked by everyone else, then it seems that many simply don’t play them, or diss them for being not perfect or AAA grade games.

Games are GAMES, to play and have some fun with. Not major novels aimed at winning a nobel peace prize.

By: Gabriel Herndon

Gabriel Herndon — Mon, 25 May 2009 23:36:18 +0000

Ha I have to played Timeshift and if I might say it was a B grade video game.

By: bearsuitmario

bearsuitmario — Mon, 25 May 2009 22:57:16 +0000

agreed, dark sector is good. i played it then sold it when it came out, then i found it new for under 10 bucks and bought it again so i could run through it maybe on hard.

By: 2Three

2Three — Mon, 25 May 2009 19:43:03 +0000

TimeShift actually ranks up their with some of my favorite shooters from this generation. It’s a blast.

Dark Sector was another enjoyable game. The atmosphere is fantastic.

By: teamshortbus1

teamshortbus1 — Mon, 25 May 2009 18:00:14 +0000

All things considered, Too Human is a clunky, overflowed and unpretty mess.

Timeshift was fun for awhile but ultimately unfufilling as it becomes crazy repetitive. I dont really have much else to say about the other games as I haven’t spent a good amount of time playing them, or even paying attention to them

By: Darkie

Darkie — Mon, 25 May 2009 15:23:42 +0000

Viking was indeed a good game, more folks should try it out now that you can probably pick it up for 10 bux. It was not a great game but certainly worth the 10 to 20 dollars that its going for nowadays.

I have found that with 360 games you really have to play them for yourself to judge them, the gaming media has all sorts of biases against the Microsoft console, it just makes the reviewers too unreliable, I dont even read professional reviews anymore.

Ninja blade, Halo Wars, Too Human, Shadowrun, all great games under rated by the big review sites.

By: bearsuitmario

bearsuitmario — Mon, 25 May 2009 14:03:15 +0000

i think anyone who dismisses these games as bad before playing them isn’t any sort of gamer at all. i know people tend to gravitate towards the most popular releases because they are huge, but that doesn’t mean you have to play them exclusively. i’ve played pretty much all 10 (except viking, which i’ll now give a go, and eternal sonata) and i have to say that i really liked condemned (one of my favorite 360 titles thus far), dark sector, infinite undiscovery, and too human. overlord, banjo and timeshift were all good enough to run through in between all the ‘call of duty and gears of war’ big titles. i didn’t care much for enchanted arms, but hey, you can’t like everything.

By: AXIS of Reality

AXIS of Reality — Mon, 25 May 2009 13:28:44 +0000

How do you know they’re shit without playing them?

Don’t base your opinion on the image created by popular opinion. Make up your own mind by playing them. Just because a game doesn’t have a 10 million dollar marketing campaign or is ignored by the general public doesn’t make it bad.

After all, you wouldn’t expect a reviewer to proclaim a game good or bad by saying ‘I didn’t play it coz it’s shit’.

If you go on thinking things like that without trying it for yourself, you’ll miss out on a lot.