Comments on: Assassin’s Creed 3: When & Where To Next? Part 1

By: dkpatriarch

dkpatriarch — Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:16:48 +0000

I’d love to follow that story in the medieval time period too.

By: Doste

Doste — Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:28:07 +0000

I think the modern time for Assassin’s Creed III is too fast. I’m waiting for next ubisoft children : d

By: Jason

Jason — Sat, 05 Jun 2010 21:23:44 +0000

*************************
**SPOILER REVIEW**
*************************
This is actually pretty obvious. It’s going to be Japan. Why?

1) There’s a big link between Japan and Assassins. One of the first assassins: Ninja.
2) There are a couple Asian assassins in the tomb.
3) The time periods are going up, but focusing around earlier to mid 1000s (Next step would bearound 1500s -1700s [P.S. European trade with Japan could actually bring Ezio into this story as well.)
4) The biggest part/SPOILER ALERT: At the end of the glyph video in AC2, Adam and Eve pretty much throw the answer at you. The mountai they look at after they reach the top of whatever they’re climbing is an exact representation of Mt. Fuji.

I could be wrong, and most of it could be coinsidence, or misinterpretation, but if I were anyone else, it would seem as though some of those are very good points, and the others, just some nonsense evidence. And the picture that’s leeked onto the web with an assassin in Egypt, could easily be a part two to the AC1 story, just as they did with Brotherhood. Who knows, it might be Assassin’s Creed: Brotherhood II. After all, we need to find out how Altair managed to continue the Creed all the way up to Rennaisance Italy. Not to mention how in the world did the Creed get that advanced technology written in that time? How did Egypt figure out how to build Pyramids? Why are there god-like people talking to you at the end of AC2? It’s just another link to lead us into the next story, and possibly the next after that. We wanted a mind-blowing story with an amazing game. We’re getting it.

By: brandon

brandon — Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:26:09 +0000

after completing AC2, especially the altair flashback, i deffinitely think the next trip in the animus is going to be the child of altair and that templar, it fits because one of the options their looking into is the middle ages, during which altair and the child live in.

just think about it, the kid could be trained by altair, and sence altair could see into the future via the apple, he possibly could educate desmond via the kid, like minerva did via enzio and it would be a great way to meet the compromise between mythical and historical

By: dkpatriarch

dkpatriarch — Sat, 02 Jan 2010 23:41:19 +0000

There is also the possibility of exploring the times and places that Subject 16 visited. A ‘prequel’ type series. That seems to be popular these days.

By: Jr94

Jr94 — Sat, 02 Jan 2010 20:15:34 +0000

I completely agree with you and I’d like to add if I may, I personally would like to see Ubisoft make the trilogy but to leave it open at the end. Then continue with ‘expansion’ style games that have their own story and to make sure they continue the link between the series. They could do a game on each piece of eden if they wanted to and with the map shown at the end of AC2 on the codex wall it’d be possible to do so, but I think that following altair’s line and the assassin order itself; it’s origins would be a great addition to the Assassin’s Creed world, I just hope they don’t cut it off at 3 and leave it there.

By: Jr94

Jr94 — Sat, 02 Jan 2010 20:05:32 +0000

Just like to point out that genghis khan was a templar, to get altair’s armour in AC2 you gotta get the seal for the assassin that killed genghis khan, and i very much doubt that a templar would have the skills to infiltrate the assassin order and then be turned on, it just doesn’t coincide with the rest of the story. Just wanted to make that point

By: Jr94

Jr94 — Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:58:51 +0000

I’d just like to point out that the story of Creed 2 was a young noble whose family was killed due to a templar conspiracy and he vows revenge and slowly becomes an assassin.

See the similarities?

By: Jr94

Jr94 — Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:15:27 +0000

I agree this is the perfect setting, all the history fits in and a lengthy and interesting storyline would be entirely possible and ubisoft could have real fun making the third game. However I read in an interview with the producer of AC and he said that he wanted the Creed series to be a trilogy, so the third game might focus on Desmond and the final bit in the whole story, but my personal opinion is that they could so easily make ten of these games, spanning all the way from the origin of the assassin order all the way to a futuristic catastrophic end of the order. I hope they don’t finish it off at 3 because they could do so much more with the series if they keep their heads screwed on.

By: dkpatriarch

dkpatriarch — Fri, 01 Jan 2010 09:41:09 +0000

I’d rather Cambodia during the age of the Khmer Civilization over the more modern tragic Communist rule. The ruins of Angkor brought back to life in the original height of the empire would be interesting, but doubt it will be a location, at least not unless it is a ruin Desmond has to visit.