Is Gaming Too Easy Today?


Is Gaming Too Easy Today?

Are games less challenging?

by Daniel Geikowski

©2013 Daniel Geikowski

uncharted-3-screenshots-oxcgn-21I’m always after new experiences.

Therefore, I recently purchased a PS3 for Christmas, and one of the first games I bought was the highly-touted Uncharted: Drake’s Fortune.

I played through the original, and while I had an enjoyable experience, it was over rather quickly.

So therefore I decided that I better purchase Uncharted 2: Among Thieves. I flew through  that also, which led me to getting my hands on Uncharted 3: Drake’s Deception.

I soon realised, that even though I’ve had my PS3 for just under a month, I’ve blasted through the Uncharted Series, as well as Ghost Recon: Future Soldier and DOOM 3: BFG Edition.

It got me thinking: have my skills as a gamer increased over time, or are games not as challenging as they once were?

Nowadays, it seems that it is all too easy to finish a game’s campaign, even playing through on Normal and Hard difficulties.

Campaigns are being hastily completed in four to five hours, when the norm used to be around ten to fifteen.

Now, before anyone jumps to conclusions, I’m not saying this is the case for every game.

What I am saying, however, is that the vast majority of games have gotten increasingly easier over the years, making it hard to find a legitimate challenge for gamers seeking one.

Sure, the vast majority of games have difficulties that increase the amount of damage enemy AI can take, but this should not be the only “challenge” gamers have the option to undertake.

It could be argued that because graphics were nowhere near the amazing levels we see and experience today, games of old had to provide another hook to keep players engaged.

Call_of_Duty_Black_Ops_2_oxcgnRetro games offered a greater challenge that required precision timing, skill, and a healthy dose of luck in order for players to succeed.

It was a time where one wrong move meant certain death, and a handful of deaths resulted in Game Over.

So what’s changed?

Game Over

Call of Duty Black Ops II_Singapore Sparks_low resFor one, a lot of games have removed the Game Over screen, typically greeted with rage by gamers after messing up objectives or getting their ass handed to them during boss battles.

Now, instead of the Game Over screen, once a player dies or fails some sort of objective, they resume playing from a nearby checkpoint or auto-save area.

While I can see the benefit of this in cases where a weird bug or erratic AI kills the player or fails an objective, it has drastically reduced the stress, tension and intensity of fighting to keep yourself alive.

One can not point the finger at any one game, as the vast majority have adopted this option, from Assassin’s Creed to Splinter Cell, the already mentioned Uncharted as well as Infamous, Halo, Call of Duty the list goes on.

Halo_4_screenshot_oxcgn 1Speaking of Call of Duty, the series was one of the pioneers of another mechanic that has been adopted by a plethora of games, that being rechargeable health.

[Ed.: While some are inevitably going to argue that Halo popularized regenerating health, not Call of Duty, neither were the first to do it; rather, they both took it and popularized it.]

This further takes the challenge away from games, and has instead enforced the habit of gamers hiding in cover, waiting until they are fully healed.

It is rare in games today, particularly in first-person shooters, to have health meters that can only be replenished through the acquisition of Health Kits.

Halo_ODST_oxcgn_screenshotThe original Halo contained health kits, and was a more challenging game because of it, but it too conformed to recharging health, with the exception of Halo: Reach and Halo 3: ODST.

I remember playing the original DOOM games, where after doing battle against a horde of demons, I’d be low on health, knowing I’d have to get past more demons in order to gain precious health kits.

It might be just me, but I felt there was more tension and intensity present, knowing that one wrong move would kill me, and making it to safety would give me a greater sense of accomplishment.

This change in games could be attributed to a greater focus on story, where players would rather progress to see what occurs next, rather than face difficult challenges along the way, with the potential for permanent death hanging over them .

No Fear

Medal-of-Honor-Warfighter-oxcgn-19In conjunction with absent Game Over screens and rechargeable health, most games tend to provide players with an endless supply of lives.

In the vast majority of games, it seems that players can continue to make mistake after mistake, constantly being killed until they pass their current objective.

There is no fear of death anymore.

Just like lambs to the slaughter, players repetitively die until they eventually make their way forward. In games of old, with only one or two lives remaining, it really forced players to learn and adapt, increasing skills quickly in order to survive.

mega man oxcgnGames such as Mega Man were brutally difficult. This is a franchise where precision timing and skill were needed in order to retain the precious few lives the player was afforded.

The widely-renowned Contra was known to also be punishing, and the three lives given to players were gone quickly unless they adapted quickly (or cheated through use of the Konami Code). [Ed.: You keep making the editorial team feel inadequate, Daniel.]

Old-school games such as Sonic The Hedgehog gave players lives to contend with, and rewarded them with extra lives, for collecting pick ups as they progressed through the level.

Thus, skill was required in order to achieve these extra lives, rather than be given to players for nothing.

max payne 3 screenshots oxcgn #15By neglecting the factor of player lives, this too has reduced some challenge in games today, not to mention limited the consequences of player actions.

One of my favourite games of 2012 was Max Payne 3, and it, among countless other games, gave players an infinite number of player lives.

Once Max was killed, instead of losing a life on the way to a Game Over screen, he’d respawn not too far away from the bad dudes that put a large amount of bullets in his face.

max payne 3 screenshots oxcgn #12While it was annoying to constantly die on occasion, I never really felt pressured to cherish my life, as I knew I’d respawn not too far from my current position.

As a result, this mechanic has also enforced another habit into gamers today, myself included; throwing caution to the wind.

I want it NOW!

dayz screenshots oxcgn #18Modern players understand that they don’t stand to lose much if they die.

They recklessly charge into oncoming enemies and gunfire, until they are the only ones left standing, therefore allowing them to move on.

While this may be fun at times, it further takes away the challenge and achievement of progressing through a game’s campaign.

This can be attributed to today’s generation and their familiarity with technology. We are used to getting everything we want almost instantaneously.

Want to find something out? Just Google it. Want a certain product? Buy it online. Download it. Whatever.

dead space 3 screenshots oxcgn #7The point is, people today don’t like waiting. They want the latest and greatest yesterday.

Games are no exception.

Instead of leveling-up or acquiring items through time, patience, and perseverance, some people would rather purchase said items and abilities, even going so far to hack them in instead of working for them.

Where is the fun in that? Where is the sense of accomplishment? Why bother even playing the game at all?

A lot of gamers want to progress whilst doing as little work as possible. Most don’t want to face nigh-impossible challenges.

dead space 3 screenshots oxcgn #10Gamers don’t want to have to restart a level, let alone from the beginning if they die. Even save points have become redundant in most games.

Games are almost at the point where it is more of a challenge to fail, and players are just going along for the ride.

Don’t touch me

uncharted 3 screenshots oxcgn #3The vast majority of games end up coddling players too much, holding their sweaty hands along the way.

Going back to my most recent example, as I was playing through the Uncharted series, I noticed that at certain points the AI companions would constantly kill enemy AI for the player.

This is by no means a bad thing, and isn’t solely limited to Uncharted, but it yet again takes the challenge away from the player by allowing the friendly AI to do the work for them.

Another recent example of this is Medal of Honor: Warfighter.

Medal-of-Honor-Warfighter-oxcgn-10Yes, we all know it wasn’t the best game in terms of execution, but I’m not going to pick on quirky bugs and glitches here.

It’s not enough that Warfighter gives you a mission in which you only fire ONE, virtually impossible to miss shot, but the AI seems to do the heavy lifting for the player, along with constantly telling them what to do.

They always lead the way, signposting every objective, in which all the player has to do is shut up and follow suit. At times it feels like the AI just patiently waits for the player to catch up before proceeding.

While most games hold players’ hands initially in the early going until they pick up the basics, some titles continue to help players a bit too much, even towards the endgame.

Time for some watersports

Games of old, and some games still today, were typically characterised to have boss battles throughout the campaign, culminating with a relatively difficult boss battle, that required players to utililse skills and weapons acquired over the course of the game.

A great example is the universally popular Ocarina of Time, where each temple would grant players a new weapon or item, which was needed to defeat that temple’s boss.

The final fight against Ganondorf/Ganon required multiple items acquired over the journey.

Nowadays, however, even some boss fights seem to have had their difficulty tapered down, or provide no challenge whatsoever.

A prime example can be seen in the Fable series, in particular Fable 2.

The boss battle is pretty much non-existent, and even goes so far as to have Reaver, one of the player’s AI partners, defeat the evil Lucien instead of the player doing so.

oxcgn fable 2 see the future #2Games need to offer challenges to players. We don’t want our hands held.

Sure, we all want to be caught up in a story, being a cog in the machine of various games worlds, but challenge us along the way.

What Are My Options?

alan wake 2 oxcgn #11Like I said earlier in this piece, making enemies take more ammo to kill doesn’t equal greater challenge.

Sure, it’s more difficult and slows progress, but shouldn’t be the only obstacle standing in the player’s way.

I understand making games more difficult would alienate a large player base, now that gaming has a greater mainstream focus. However, that’s not what I’m after.

Games should cater to gamers of every skill level. Some players may just want to be told a story, where others may be wanting to withstand punishment along the way.

Halo_4_screenshot_oxcgn 8Every game should give the player the option of a much greater challenge that requires both patience and skill to complete. In that respect, some games do offer what I’m after.

The Halo series utilises their famous skulls, which alters the gameplay in a variety of ways, to add more challenge in completing the standard campaign.

Max Payne 3 offers New York Minute, where players must replenish an always-decreasing timer through killing bad guys, with more precious seconds rewards for greater skill and precision.

Dead Space 2 contains Hard Core Mode, that not only raises the health and damage of enemies, but utilises game mechanics reminiscent of old hardcore games.

fallout new vegas oxcgn #26Hard Core mode limits the player to three saves for the entire game, provides less ammo drops, so that players can’t rely on the crutches of current games (respawning/close checkpoints/recharging health).

Fallout: New Vegas also has their Hardcore/Survival mode, in which players must constantly deal with hunger, dehydration, and sleep deprivation.

Ammo has weight, and medical items heal over time instead of instantaneously.

bioshock infinite new screenshots oxcgn #1There is hope for the future, though. The upcoming BioShock Infinite will feature “1999 Mode” where player decisions are permanent, ammo is less frequent, and save points are rare.

While these are a few examples of games offering a greater challenge to players, they do make up a minority. In my opinion, every game should have the option for optional, difficult challenges.

There is hope

dark souls oxcgnMost platforms today have access to difficult retro games for those seeking challenges, but we should not have to rely on games of the past in order to find difficult challenges.

While it seems like most games today are genuinely easy to complete in one mode or another, there are a few gems being released today that offer greater challenge to those who love receiving punishment.

Demon/Dark Souls is widely known to be a punishingly difficult game, constantly killing the player for mistakes made, or lack of skill. Sure, there is no game over, but every enemy requires sound strategy and timing in order to be successful.

trials evolution origin of pain screenshots oxcgn #2Super Meat Boy is a platforming game that also has an infinite number of lives, yet requires skill and expert timing in order to complete the game;s 300 odd levels.

Trials HD is a side scrolling physics-based motorcycle racer that yet again requires skill, patience, and,determination in order to complete the game’s more difficult tracks.


company of heroes 2 screenshots oxcgn #4While these and more titles are available to truly test the limits of players, they now occupy a small section of the larger gaming world, and that’s a shame.

Yes, there are games out there that are difficult to play, but overall, gaming today too often holds the player’s hand. Most gamers don’t want to be guided through games, being told what to do.

The joy of figuring out how to proceed, and the sense of accomplishment from overcoming a generally difficult challenge — not a horde of mindless enemies — when you know failure means certain death, is what is sorely missed in the majority of games today.

I’m not asking for every game to punish me for every wrong move I make; instead, I want games to make me think.

I want that sense of accomplishment of completing increasingly difficult objectives.

I want to see my skills as a player grow.

I want a greater challenge.

It’s not hard.

©2013 Daniel Geikowski

Published by

Daniel Geikowski

Like many of you out there, Daniel has a great passion for video games. So much so that he quit his day job to complete a Bachelor of Arts: Games and Interactivity degree. Follow him on Twitter @Deus_Exer

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s