Call of Duty vs. Battlefield: How Gamers Ruin Both… and Gaming

When competition ruins appreciation

by Michael Gilbert

© 2013 Michael Gilbert

As gamers, we often come to establish what we think of a game based on our previous experiences.

This shooter is realistic because head shots kill people in one shot, this racer is awesome because my Camaro sounds really loud (just like Dad’s—for those of us with dads that have Camaros), this Mario game is fun because it makes funny sounds and I laughed my ass off (LMFAO for you more apt readers).

We also make comparisons based on games we did or didn’t like before.

Halo is better than Quake because the graphics are better, or, for a more ignorant comparison, World of Warcraft is the worst game ever “’cuz only nerds play that game. YOLO. Swagg.”

But what we fail to do is recognize the smaller accomplishments that actually construct a game’s ‘personality’, as I like to call it.

Something that comparing a game to another simply just can’t do.

Is competition ruining modern gaming?

Filed under: Blogbanter, Comparison, Console gaming, Durango, Game Impressions, GameBanter, Gamer's Debate, New PS3 Games, New Xbox 360 Games, Next Gen, Opinion article, Orbis, Oxcgn Special feature, PC News, PlayStation 4, PS3 News, PSVita, SteamBox, Wii News, Wii U, Wii U News, Wii U News, Xbox 360, Xbox 360 News, Xbox 720 | Tagged: Battlefield, Call Of Duty, Call of Duty vs. Battlefield, Competitive gaming, Game Story, video games | Leave a Comment »